Conflicts between Applicable Law and the Law of the Seat and the Limitations of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards: Lessons from Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) vs. Impregilo Spa

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTsietsi, T.
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-28T11:40:37Z
dc.date.available2016-11-28T11:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractA mixed international arbitration involves parties from two different States. The parties agree on the applicable law, which is the substantive law to be applied by an arbitral tribunal. The seat of arbitration, however, also plays a fundamental role by elucidating the applicable procedural rules. This is the lex arbitri. Sometimes arbitrators can find it difficult to determine which law is applicable to which issues. This was the case in LHDA v Impregilo1.
dc.identifier.citationTsietsi, T. (2013) Conflicts between Applicable Law and the Law of the Seat and the Limitations of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards: Lessons from Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) vs. Impregilo Spa. Lesotho Law Journal, Vol. 20, Nos. 1 & 2: 171 � 194.
dc.identifier.issn0255-6474
dc.identifier.otherY
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.tml.nul.ls/handle/20.500.14155/152
dc.language.isoEn
dc.publisherLesotho Law JournaL
dc.rightsCopyright Sabinet. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectApplicable Law
dc.titleConflicts between Applicable Law and the Law of the Seat and the Limitations of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards: Lessons from Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) vs. Impregilo Spaen
dc.typeArticle
Files
Collections
Research Articles